Team Behaviours
High Performance Teams don’t just work hard—they work well together. At the heart of their success are six key collaborative micro behaviours that build trust, connection, and momentum.
These behaviours form the second pillar of the HPTQ™ and are consistently used by high-performing teams more than 80% of the time.
1. Positive Interdependence
High-performing teams understand that individual success is tied to collective success.
Instead of competing, they collaborate—knowing that when one person thrives, the team thrives. This creates natural motivation to support each other and work in sync.
2. Introduction of New Ideas
Innovation isn’t accidental. These teams actively seek diverse ideas, encourage different perspectives, and foster psychological safety where everyone’s voice can be heard—without prejudice or hierarchy.
3. Cooperation & Task Division
Work is divided into clear, manageable parts, with tasks shared fairly and aligned to strengths. Everyone knows their role in delivering the bigger picture—and pulls in the same direction.
4. Conflict Resolution
Conflict is inevitable. High-performing teams treat it as a natural part of collaboration, equipped with the skills to tackle disagreement respectfully and productively—preserving relationships and momentum.
5. Sharing of Resources
They willingly share knowledge, tools, and time. Resource pooling is the norm, and asking for help is seen as a strength, not a weakness.
6. Effective Communication
From listening and speaking to non-verbal cues, these teams understand that communication is the thread that holds everything together. They’re aware of its impact—positive or negative—and use it to build connection and clarity.
Want to see how your team performs across these six behaviours—and get a clear roadmap for improving collaboration?
The HPTQ™ identifies strengths, pinpoints areas for growth, and helps build the behaviours that make a measurable difference.
Team Sentiment
High Performance Teams don’t just perform well—they feel good about how they work together.
Team sentiment is the emotional pulse of a team, and it directly impacts motivation, resilience, and long-term performance.
As the third pillar of the HPTQ™, team sentiment is measured across three essential dimensions:
1. Perception of Performance
Do team members speak positively about how the team is performing, or do they focus on what’s going wrong?
2. Commitment to the Team
Are individuals truly invested in the team’s success—or just going through the motions?
3. Engagement with Purpose
Do people feel connected to the team’s mission and believe in what the team is working to achieve?
Together, these dimensions provide a powerful indicator of how people experience being part of the team.
The Power of Language
We go deeper by assessing your Team Language Ratio—the balance of emotionally positive to negative statements made about the team.
High-performing teams consistently show a ratio of 4:1 or greater. That means for every negative comment, there are four positive ones—signaling high trust, belief in success, and strong team cohesion.
What It Reveals
Team sentiment offers more than just a snapshot of morale—it shows:
-
How connected individuals feel to each other
-
Their belief in the purpose and direction of the team
-
Their confidence in achieving success together
The HPTQ™ benchmarks your team’s sentiment against high-performing teams, then provides a practical, step-by-step action plan to elevate emotional engagement and unlock higher performance.
Grounded in Research
The HPTQ™ is built on 27 years of direct work with over 600 organisations—and backed by global research from McKinsey, Deloitte, Harvard Business School, the University of Michigan, IPA, and Breakthrough.
It’s evidence-based insight that leads to real, measurable change.
| Organisation | Year | Teams |
|---|---|---|
| McKinsey | 1993 | 47 |
| Deloitte | 2002 | 90 |
| Harvard Business School | 2002 | 40 |
| University of Michigan | 2004 | 60 |
| McKinsey | 2011 | 42 |
| Independent Project Analysis | 1991-2011 | 300 |
| Independent Project Analysis | 2018 | 56 |
| Breakthrough Change Management | 2005-2023 | 49 |
| Total Organisations | 684 |


